In his book, Norms and Nobility (University Press), David Hicks
wrote, "The modern affectation [pretense] for pattern breaking is a bit of
educational tomfoolery - a fashionable intellectual fatalism that denies all
transcendent value in learning and plays into the hands of utilitarians and
other ideologues whose positivism methodically excludes from any emerging
patterns a great store of human wisdom and truth, while buying off man's
freedom by excusing him from responsibility for what he knows" (p. 8).
In this statement the author puts his finger on one of the greatest
problems facing western culture today. The pattern of pattern breaking. We are
the recipients of history's wisdom. This wisdom has been inculcated in our
civil, political, religious, and cultural institutions. But from the
replacement of the ancient liturgies of the church (e.g., contemporary
"worship"); to the use of the filibuster on capital hill to block the
appointments of judges; to the forsaking of the division of powers (judicial
activism); to the civil institution of marriage (e.g., gay marriage:); the
people of the west are now engaged in nothing less than the wholesale
abandonment of the storehouse of western wisdom and truth. This wisdom has
been forged in the bloody battlefields of western history, fashioned in the
courts of jurisprudence, debated in the classrooms of liberal arts and
academic freedom, and practiced in the homes by parental authority. These are
among the most recent patterns that have been victimized by our generation.
In the rush to license gays to marry or to grant to these relationships the
status of ‘civil union’ (a rose by any other name is still a rose), we are
witnessing the overthrow of a pattern handed down from old in favor of a
selfish passion born in arrogance and immediate gratification. Western
civilization has rendered a judgement.
The institution of marriage is between one man and one woman and has as its
principle function the wholeness needed to bear and raise future citizens of
the civilization. This received pattern does not deny that homosexuality was
an accepted practice in ancient Athens and Rome (neither of which based their
laws on the Christian religion). But in their collective wisdom, even pagan
Athens and Rome did not institutionalize these homosexual relationships in the
same way they did the marriage of one man and one woman. Nor does the received
pattern deny the truth of countless occasions of adulteries and infidelity by
married people in every time, generation, and culture. Even though many
powerful emperors, kings, and queens were often well known for their
infidelity, they knew better than to grant the activity the status of a legal
institution on par with marriage. The received pattern in the west is not the
pattern of polygamy, though it can be shown even biblical figures had more
than one wife. We are not the civilization of harems, incest, or pedophilia,
though these things have often been practiced throughout every generation.
We are the recipients of a better wisdom and a greater virtue. History has
rendered a judgment on marriage that has withstood the test of time and
produced a civilization rich in benefits. If we are going to preserve this
union, indeed the best that western civilization has to offer, we must break
from our pattern of pattern breaking and save ourselves from the ideologues
and utilitarians. We will need to rediscover our history, both secular and
sacred, and yield to their lessons. In the midst of this war on Islamic
terrorism, we stand in the midst of a greater threat and a greater war. For
the greatest threat to western civilization is not the isolated attacks on
groups of people. The greatest threat is from the wholesale rejection of the
patterns and judgements that have created all that is great about western
civilization.
Rev. Craig Stanford
Pastor-Immanuel Ev. Lutheran Church
Headmaster-The Robert Preus Lutheran High School
An additional note: The Holy Scripture belongs to the church and inside the
church we ought to lead off our arguments with Holy Scripture. But when we
address matters outside the church common sense, sound reasoning, and evidence
ought to be our primary weapons. This is why I have written in this way.